Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079733›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

A novel GAM-based method for predicting phosphate (PO

Müge Erkan Can

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Müge Erkan CanDepartment of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Faculty of Agriculture, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphate (PO Background: Phosphate pollution in irrigation areas, particularly in regions with shallow groundwater and intensive agriculture, poses serious environmental and agricultural risks, including eutrophication and water-quality degradation. Conventional methods for phosphate monitoring are often time-consuming, costly, and spatially limited, making them unsuitable for real-time applications. Furthermore, the complex, nonlinear interactions between phosphate concentrations and environmental variables, including nitrate, nitrite, pH, EC, flow rate, and precipitation, challenge traditional predictive approaches. While various machine learning models have been explored for phosphorus prediction, their computational demands and overfitting risks often limit their field-level applicability. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a robust, efficient, and interpretable method for predicting phosphate concentrations using a GAM and leveraging daily environmental data collected in a Mediterranean irrigation district in Türkiye. Methods: Daily water samples were collected at the outlet of the L4 agricultural catchment in the Akarsu Irrigation District (AID) on the Lower Seyhan Plain, Türkiye, during the 2022 and 2023 water years. The area is characterized by intensively managed irrigated cropland and shallow groundwater conditions. A total of 522 daily observations were compiled, including PO Results: This study developed a data-driven method for estimating PO

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationEnvironmental MonitoringPhosphatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalGroundwaterWater QualityPhosphatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAgricultural pollutionGeneralized additive model (GAM)Machine learningPhosphate predictionWater quality monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42079733
PMCPMC13135335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.