Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079690›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada2025

Involving Physiotherapists in the Conduct of Research: A Mixed Methods Study of Physiotherapist Experiences, Perceptions, and Clinical Practice in a Research Project Using a Standardized Clinical Measure of Standing Balance.

Kathryn M Sibley, Patricia Roche, Ann Jansson, Rudy Niebuhr, Marla K Beauchamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Commentary on Sibley et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn M SibleyFrom the: Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Patricia RocheGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Ann JanssonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Rudy NiebuhrHealth Sciences Centre Winnipeg, Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Marla K BeauchampSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objectives of this study were to understand the experiences, perceptions, and clinical practice of physiotherapists involved in planning, data collection, and interpretation for a study using a standardized measure of standing balance (the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test [Mini BESTest]). Method: We conducted a concurrent mixed methods study. We conducted semi-structured interviews with five phsyiotherapists exploring perceptions and experiences. We administered questionnaires on study satisfaction, confidence, and intention to use the Mini BESTest six times during the study. We extracted use of the Mini BESTest on non-study patients from a patient database. Results: Physiotherapists administered the Mini BESTest for all 59 clinical study patients. Study satisfaction was high (median 80%) and increased over time ( Conclusions: Involving physiotherapists in clinical research increased confidence and use of the measure with non-study patients.

Indexed as

interviewpostural balanceprofessional practiceresearch.

Identifiers

PMID42079690
PMCPMC13134894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.