ArticlePhysiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada2025
Advanced Practice Physiotherapy in Canada: A Survey of Canadian Physiotherapists.
Article in Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary on Matifat et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2025Article
- Rehabilitation in emergency departments: A regional scan and future opportunities.Healthcare management forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Advanced practice physiotherapy (APP) represents an important development for the physiotherapy profession worldwide but few studies have documented these models in Canada and the physiotherapists working in such models. The objective of this study was to identify and describe Canadian physiotherapists in APP roles and their models of care (MoC) and identify barriers and facilitators of APP development in Canada. Method: An electronic survey was sent to Canadian physiotherapists with the collaboration of various professional organizations. The questionnaire included 37 questions about APP roles and MoC. Results: Fifty-seven physiotherapists identified themselves as APPs and completed the survey. Most practised in private clinics (58.1%) or outpatient orthopaedic clinics (27.9%) and provided care to adults (95.3%) with orthopaedics disorders (86.0%). Most APPs were involved in first-contact and leading overall care (52.3%) or triage roles where they identify surgical candidates (68.2%). APPs mentioned their roles were established to improve care efficiency (82.1%) and were viewed positively by medical teams (76.9%) and patients (76.9%). Professional regulations (32.4%) and funding of roles and models (24.3%) were identified as barriers. Conclusions: Results of this study provide new original data regarding APP practice and MoC in Canada, acknowledging the various APP MoC and roles of respondents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.