Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079685›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada2025

Factors Affecting Standing and Walking Outcomes for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury During In-Patient Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study on the Perspectives of Physiotherapists.

Merna Seliman, Julianne Hong, Kaitlyn Gonzaga, Dalton L Wolfe, Jean-François Lemay, Andrea Chase, Kristen Walden, Sarah J Donkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Merna SelimanFrom the: Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3756-5377
Julianne HongParkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Kaitlyn GonzagaSchool of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Dalton L WolfeFrom the: Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-7360
Jean-François LemaySchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-2123
Andrea ChaseThe Ottawa Hospital Réhabilitation Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9367-9694
Kristen WaldenPraxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah J DonkersSchool of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6973-0961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Standing and walking outcomes following spinal cord injury (SCI) vary across rehabilitation centres and therapists. Much of this variation has been attributed to individual patient characteristics. However, insight from frontline health care providers, as well as exploration of comprehensive contributing factors, have been under-investigated. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of physiotherapists on factors affecting standing and walking recovery and outcomes during in-patient SCI rehabilitation. Method: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured focus group interviews. Our qualitative approach was grounded in interpretive description and used reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Ten physiotherapy representatives of seven different in-patient SCI rehabilitation sites across Canada participated. Dosage, organizational culture, length of stay, staffing, equipment, relationships, atmosphere, and mindset were the key factors identified. Our findings also highlight that how factors impact a site may differ, but perspectives on which factors influence standing and walking outcomes were similar. Factors beyond the individual and the relationship of these factors on training dosage were emphasized. Conclusion: Future work is needed to better understand the role of institutional culture, to design and implement potential ways to address key contributing factors, and to evaluate if such initiatives lead to improvements in standing and walking outcomes.

Indexed as

neurological rehabilitationqualitative researchrecovery of functionspinal cord injurystanding positiontreatment outcomeswalking.

Identifiers

PMID42079685
PMCPMC13134895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.