ArticlePhysiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada2025
Developing a Community-Based Exercise and Physical Programme for Runners With Patellofemoral Pain in Under-Resourced Communities: A Delphi Study.
Article in Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a multifactorial condition that is highly prevalent among recreational runners. Poor homeostasis between load and runner's capacity is the main cause of PFP. A low-cost and community-based intervention is needed to address the rehabilitation needs of runners in under-resourced communities. The purpose of this study was to develop a community-based exercise and physical programme for runners with PFP in under-resourced communities. Method: This study used a Delphi method that included sports experts (physicians, physiotherapists, biokineticists, podiatrists, and sports therapists) who consented to participate. Delphi included three rounds of iterations to attain consensus among experts. Experts reached a consensus by rating PFP programme items using the 5-point Likert scale. Results: Ten experts participated. There were more males ( Conclusions: A consensus was reached for a suitable exercise and physical programme for runners in under-resourced communities. A follow-up implementation study is, therefore, recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.