Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079618›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Clinical activity and safety of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: findings from REALIPINIVO, a real-world study.

Francesco Caraglia, Giuseppe Argenziano, Marcella Scala, Francesca Sparano, Teresa Del Giudice, Maria Chiara Sergi, Antonio Maria Grimaldi, Miriam Forte, Silvana Cozzolino, Antonino Colloca and 17 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Francesco CaragliaDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Giuseppe ArgenzianoDermatology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Marcella ScalaClinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Francesca SparanoUnit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Teresa Del GiudiceOncology Unit, Oncology Department, "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU) Dulbecco" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Chiara SergiUnit of Medical Oncology, "Mons. A.R. Dimiccoli" Hospital, Barletta, Italy.
Antonio Maria GrimaldiMedical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale (AORN) San Pio, Benevento, Italy.
Miriam ForteDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Silvana CozzolinoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Antonino CollocaDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Alfonso EspositoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Maria Cristina GiuglianoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Eleonora CioliDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Margaret OttavianoUnit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Lucia IavaronePhD Course in Public Health, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Renato FrancoPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Camila ScharfDermatology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Anna RussoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Salvatore CappabiancaDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Paolo Antonio AsciertoUnit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Valerio NardoneDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Luigi FormisanoClinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Stefania NapolitanoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Davide CiardielloDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Fortunato CiardielloDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Teresa TroianiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Vincenzo De FalcoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Metastatic melanoma has historically had a poor prognosis; however, survival has improved with immunotherapies, such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, and molecular targeted therapies for BRAF-mutant tumors. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab is highly effective, though with increased rates of toxicity. In Italy, since January 2022, such therapeutic combination has been approved and reimbursed only for metastatic melanoma patients with brain metastases or with PD-L1 expression <1%. Methods: We conducted a real-world study in six academic centers in southern Italy and analyzed the efficacy and toxicity outcomes in 72 patients. Results: The response rate was 54% (39/72) and, after 13.6 months of median follow-up, a longer median progression-free survival [17.03 months (95% CI 4.8-18.6)] compared to the pivotal CheckMate-067 trial or to other real-world studies. Better survival correlated with objective responses (p<0.0001) and low disease burden (less than three metastatic sites) (p=0.0415). All patients achieving an objective response had tumors with high or intermediatetumor mutational burden. The rates of immune-related adverse events were similar to those reported in the literature, but there was a lower therapy discontinuation rate. This might be due to more appropriate managing of emerging immunotherapy toxicities.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsIpilimumabMelanomaNivolumabSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIpilimumabNivolumabimmunotherapyipilimumabmelanomanivolumabreal-world

Identifiers

PMID42079618
PMCPMC13128669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.