ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: γδ T cells play a key role in modulating immune responses to pregnancy-associated malaria and can enhance vaccine efficacy through their activation and cytotoxic functions. However, the mechanisms guiding γδT cell differentiation in placental malaria (PM) remain poorly understood. We examined Methods: A case-control study including 50 women at delivery (21 PM+, 29 PM-) was carried out. Peripheral, placental intervillous space, and cord blood mononuclear cells were isolated, and multiparametric flow cytometry was performed to characterize γδT-cells and memory phenotypes, its subsets (Vδ1 Results: In general, the frequency of γδ T cells and their subsets varied depending on the different blood compartments, with naïve and central memory (CM) phenotypes observed mainly in CBMC, while effector memory (EM) and terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA) phenotypes were found mainly in PBMC and IVBMC. Conclusion: Placental malaria is associated with a compartment-specific memory γδ T cell differentiation, with cytokines and metabolic reprogramming regulating exhaustion. These findings reveal key regulatory processes that determine the function of γδ T cells during placental malaria, which constitute potential targets for new therapeutic intervention against PM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.