ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2010
Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
172 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Horizon scanning of potential environmental applications of terrestrial animals, fish, algae and microorganisms produced by genetic modification, including the use of new genomic techniques.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Pooled it
- Does the growing of Bt maize change abundance or ecological function of non-target animals compared to the growing of non-GM maize? A systematic review.Environmental evidence · 2022Pooled it
- No effects of Bacillus thuringiensis maize on nontarget organisms in the field in southern Europe: a meta-analysis of 26 arthropod taxa.Transgenic research · 2014Pooled it
- Assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11 × MIR162 × MON 89034 × NK603 (application GMFF-2025-33624).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Assessment of genetically modified RF3 Canola Quality (CQ)EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- T-DNA Analyzer: A Long-Read Sequencing Pipeline for Characterizing T-DNA Insertion Sites in Transgenic Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Assessment of genetically modified soybean DAS-44406 × FG72 (dossier GMFF-2025-34192).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Read-mapping signatures for molecular characterization of transgenic DNA insertions in paired-end Illumina data.BMC biotechnology · 2026Article
- The NRT1.1-NLP7 Nexus: An Integrative Signaling Nexus from Nitrate Sensing to Systemic Adaptation and Structure-Guided Engineering.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Gene Flow and Hybridization Potential Between GM/NGT Crops and Conventional Varieties or Wild Relatives: A Scoping Literature Review with Emphasis on Oilseed Rape (Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Assessment of additional information related to genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 (application EFSA-GMO-BE-2016-138).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- From rhizome diffusion to programmable architecture: a systems framework for controllable spatial expansion in bamboo and other clonal plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Safety Assessment ofJournal of toxicology · 2026Article
- Assessment of genetically modified soybean GMB151 × DAS-44406-6 (application GMFF-2024-21774, EFSA-Q-2024-00330).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 94313 (application GMFF-2022-6595).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Assessment of genetically modified cotton T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA-GMO-BE-2018-155).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 × COT102 (application EFSA-GMO-ES-2017-147).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9 (application GMFF-2022-6232).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 94637 (application GMFF-2023-21116).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Governance Perspectives on Genetically Modified Animals for Agriculture and Aquaculture: Challenges for the Assessment of Environmental Risks and Broader Societal Concerns.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This document provides guidance for the environmental risk assessment (ERA) of genetically modified (GM) plants submitted within the framework of Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 on GM food and feed or under Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This document provides guidance for assessing potential effects of GM plants on the environment and the rationales for the data requirements for a comprehensive ERA of GM plants. The ERA should be carried out on a case-by-case basis, following a step-by-step assessment approach. This document describes the six steps for the ERA of GM plants, as indicated in Directive 2001/18/EC, starting with (1) problem formulation including hazard identification; (2) hazard characterisation; (3) exposure characterisation; (4) risk characterisation; (5) risk management strategies; and (6) an overall risk evaluation. The scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) considers seven specific areas of concern to be addressed by applicants and risk assessors during the ERA (1) persistence and invasiveness of the GM plant, or its compatible relatives, including plant-to-plant gene transfer; (2) plant-to-micro-organism gene transfer; (3) interaction of the GM plant with target organisms and (4) interaction of the GM plant with non-target organisms, including criteria for selection of appropriate species and relevant functional groups for risk assessment; (5) impact of the specific cultivation, management and harvesting techniques; including consideration of the production systems and the receiving environment(s); (6) effects on biogeochemical processes; and (7) effects on human and animal health. Each specific area of concern is considered in a structured and systematic way following the above-mentioned steps (1 to 6). In addition, the guidance document is supplemented with several general cross-cutting considerations (e.g. choice of comparator, receiving environment(s), general statistical principles, long-term effects) that need to be considered in the ERA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.