Morphological and phylogenetic evidence reveal two new

Xin Zhang, Hong-Min Zhou, Zhe-Hui Tu, Guang-Yu Zeng, Yu-Cheng Dai

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in MycoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin ZhangSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University Kunming China https://ror.org/03dfa9f06.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8363-7852

Hong-Min ZhouCollege of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University Beijing China https://ror.org/04xv2pc41.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-5815

Zhe-Hui TuSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University Kunming China https://ror.org/03dfa9f06.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8444-9270

Guang-Yu ZengSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University Kunming China https://ror.org/03dfa9f06.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8609-1612

Yu-Cheng DaiSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University Kunming China https://ror.org/03dfa9f06.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6523-0320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AuricularialesChinajelly funginew speciesphylogenytaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID42079511

DOI10.3897/mycokeys.131.189424

PMCPMC13135197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.