Article in MycoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Gui-Qing ZhangDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University Qujing China https://ror.org/02ad7ap24.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-0607
Nakarin SuwannarachDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University Qujing China https://ror.org/02ad7ap24.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-1913
Terd DisayathanoowatDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University Qujing China https://ror.org/02ad7ap24.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6416-2266
Rasmi ShoocongdejThe Conservation of Ancient Log Coffins of Phi Man Long Long Rak Cave, Mae Hong Son Province Project, Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropological Centre, 20, Boromrachachonnani Road, Taling Chan, Bangkok 10170, Thailand Office of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand https://ror.org/05m2fqn25.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3018-5088
Varis DomethongThe Conservation of Ancient Log Coffins of Phi Man Long Long Rak Cave, Mae Hong Son Province Project, Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropological Centre, 20, Boromrachachonnani Road, Taling Chan, Bangkok 10170, Thailand Office of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand https://ror.org/05m2fqn25.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8107-5335
Dong-Qin DaiCenter for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization & Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Fungal Sustainable Utilization in South and Southeast Asia, College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655099, China Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand https://ror.org/05m2fqn25.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-8807
Rui-Meng LiuCenter for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization & Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Fungal Sustainable Utilization in South and Southeast Asia, College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655099, China Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand https://ror.org/05m2fqn25.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7314-2951
Nalin N WijayawardeneCenter for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization & Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Fungal Sustainable Utilization in South and Southeast Asia, College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655099, China Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand https://ror.org/05m2fqn25.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-5498
Jaturong KumlaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University Qujing China https://ror.org/02ad7ap24.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3673-6541
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Caves are globally recognised as reservoirs of high fungal diversity, with cave soils harbouring many previously underexplored taxa. Fungal research in Thailand has been conducted for more than two decades; however, studies focusing on fungal diversity in cave environments remain limited. In the present study, six fungal strains were isolated from soil samples collected from the prehistoric Phi Man Long Long Rak Cave located in Pang Mapha District, Mae Hong Son Province, northern Thailand. These strains were identified, based on morphological characteristics and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses using sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (LSU), β-tubulin (
Indexed as
Cave fungimulti-locus phylogenynew taxataxonomytropical area
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Two new soil-inhabiting fungi, · full record | OpenQuestion