ReviewMaterials today. Bio2026
Mechanically adaptive materials with tunable stiffness for biomedical devices: Mechanisms, applications, and perspectives.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variable-stiffness materials are engineered systems that can reversibly tune their mechanical stiffness through diverse mechanisms. In recent years, researchers have paid growing attention to these materials because they can adapt to different tasks, support multiple functions, and safely interact with soft biological tissues. For these reasons, they show strong potential for biomedical devices. However, most existing studies focus on single material systems or individual actuation modes, which limits the integration of different stiffness-control strategies within metamaterial-inspired architectures. As a result, cross-mechanism synergy remains underexplored, and unified system-level design rules are still lacking. This review summarizes recent progress in variable-stiffness materials for biomedical devices over the past decade. We divide current approaches into three main groups based on their working mechanisms: jamming-based systems, stimuli-responsive material-based systems, and antagonistic actuation-based systems. For each group, we explain the basic working principles and typical structural designs. We then describe how different activation methods control stiffness and support functional adaptation. Building on this, an application-oriented analysis is conducted across five representative biomedical device domains, including drug delivery systems, wearable assistive devices, minimally invasive surgical tools, bone repair applications, and adaptive sensing platforms, with a comparative evaluation of the suitability and prevalence of different stiffness modulation mechanisms in each domain. Finally, we discuss future research directions. These include AI-based real-time stiffness control, multimodal human-machine interfaces, 4D-printed adaptive structures, and bio-integrated hybrid materials. Together, these advances may help move Variable-stiffness materials from laboratory studies toward practical clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.