Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079474›Full record

ArticlePortuguese journal of public health2026

High Utilisation Behaviour in Emergency Departments: Predictors in Baixo Alentejo Region.

Allan Alves Nogueira, Ana Dionísio, José Queimado, Paulo Sousa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Portuguese journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allan Alves NogueiraNOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana DionísioUnidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Alentejo, Beja, Portugal.
José QueimadoUnidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Alentejo, Beja, Portugal.
Paulo SousaNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, LA-REAL, CCAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: High utilisation of emergency departments (EDs) is a behaviour present in a minority of patients but accounts for a disproportionate share of visits and resources. Understanding their characteristics and predictors is essential for planning targeted interventions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study analysed all ED visits in 2024 at the Unidade Local de Saúde do Baixo Alentejo (ULSBA). Patient behaviour was classified as control (≤3 visits), moderate frequent use (4-9 visits), or high frequent use (≥10 visits). Variables included sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, outcomes, and utilisation measures. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Among 50,626 patients accounting for 116,885 ED visits, 5,315 (10.5%) presented high utilisation, responsible for 31.7% of visits. These patients were more likely to be female and to present mental or social comorbidities. A bimodal age distribution was observed, with peaks under 30 years and over 60 years. Multivariate analysis identified female sex, mental and social comorbidities, and residence in Castro Verde or Moura as predictors of high utilisation. These patients were more likely to leave without treatment but less likely to die during ED episodes compared with controls. Discussion/Conclusion: High utilisations are present in heterogeneous populations, concentrated mostly in younger psychosocially vulnerable patients and older multimorbid adults. While they do not appear to drive ED overcrowding directly, their profiles reflect unmet needs in social and primary care systems. Tailored interventions across health and social services are needed to solve their issues and reduce avoidable ED use.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentFrequent usersHealth services utilisationPortugalPredictors

Identifiers

PMID42079474
PMCPMC13134859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.