ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Digital competence in health and nursing education: a cross-national comparison between samples from Germany and India using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The digital transformation in healthcare requires future professionals to have solid digital skills. Despite the global relevance of digital skills, little is known about how these skills differ in countries with different healthcare and education systems. This study compares the self-assessed digital skills of two institutional samples of healthcare and nursing students in Germany and India using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire and examines the correlation between perceived competence and the strategies reported for searching for information. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in April and May 2025 among 49 students in Germany and 256 students in India. Digital competences were assessed using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire, which covers all five dimensions of the DigComp framework. An open-ended question was used to record the students' strategies for searching for reliable information on the internet. The quantitative data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Levene test, and the t-test for two independent samples. Results: Both cohorts showed acceptable to high internal consistency across all DigKomp 2.2 dimensions. Students in the German cohort reported higher competencies in data processing and evaluation and communication/collaboration, while students from the Indian cohort scored higher in digital content creation, security and problem solving. The exploratory bivariate analysis between the Indian and German samples revealed significant differences in 7 out of 15 items, specifically within the dimensions of digital content creation (3/3 items), Security (2/3 items), data processing & evaluation (1/3 items), and problem solving (1/4 items), whereas no significant differences were found in communication/cooperation (0/2 items). Qualitative responses revealed structured and academically oriented search strategies among German cohort. Indian responses showed greater heterogeneity. Discussion: Digital competence development varies substantially between the two institutional samples, reflecting differences in educational structures, access to digital technologies and national digitalization trajectories. While German students demonstrate strong academically grounded competencies, Indian students exhibit strengths in practical and applied digital competence. These findings underscore the need for context-sensitive digital education strategies that combine structured research competencies with practical digital literacy to prepare students for increasingly digitalized healthcare environments in both countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.