SynthesisF1000Research2024
Consumer responses and determinants in geographical indications agricultural product consumption: A ten-year systematic review.
Synthesis in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article analyzes the determinants of consumers' purchase and consumption of geographical indication (GI) agricultural products through a ten-year systematic review. There exist growing concerns about food safety, quality, and health, increasing consumer attention to origin labelled foods. GI agricultural products have gained a stable position in global food markets. This study pursues two objectives. First, it identifies and classifies the key determinants of GI agricultural product consumption reported in the literature. Second, it compares insights from five existing review studies on closely related themes to clarify what is already established and what remains contested. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a transparent and reproducible systematic literature review, including structured searching, screening, and data extraction procedures. The results summarize how consumers respond to GI cues and identify factors associated with heterogeneous responses across contexts. By integrating fragmented evidence, this review clarifies consumption relevant mechanisms and offers implications for GI governance and marketing, helping firms better understand consumer decision making and supporting value capture for farmers, producers, and regional stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.