Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079462›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2026

Artificial intelligence for predicting paediatric acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rupesh Raina, Parth Shirode, Raghav Shah, Aanya Chepyala, Abhishek Tibrewal, Sidharth Kumar Sethi, Wisit Cheungpasitporn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rupesh RainaDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.
Parth ShirodeDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7837-5975
Raghav ShahDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
Aanya ChepyalaDepartment of Nephrology, Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA.
Abhishek TibrewalDepartment of Nephrology, Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA.
Sidharth Kumar SethiPediatric Nephrology, Kidney Institute, Medanta, The Medicity Hospital, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-3393
Wisit CheungpasitpornDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9954-9711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalised children is a major complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) models may enable early detection and risk stratification. This systematic review evaluates the performance of AI/ML models for predicting paediatric AKI across clinical settings. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies applying AI/ML models to predict AKI in paediatric populations. Studies reporting performance metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1 score were included. Results: Among 470 records identified, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 14 AI/ML models used. The overall sample size included 33 949 paediatric patients with an AKI proportion of 12.5%. Meta-analyses of the AUC were conducted on neural network, gradient boosting, and logistic regression. Gradient boosting had the highest pooled AUC of 0.873 (95% confidence interval 0.836-0.909). Random forest demonstrated the highest median sensitivity (0.821), specificity (0.942), PPV (0.860), NPV (0.935), and accuracy (0.821); however, these metrics could not be pooled due to inconsistent reporting and limited validation. Conclusion: Gradient boosting, random forest, and logistic regression demonstrated reasonable predictive performance for paediatric AKI prediction within specific clinical contexts. However, small sample size, heterogeneity, lack of testing/validation cohorts, insufficient data, and inconsistent patient populations and AKI diagnostic criteria restrict generalisability.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningpaediatric acute kidney injurypaediatric nephrologypredictive modelling

Identifiers

PMID42079462
PMCPMC13134450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.