ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial dysfunction in ARDS: unraveling the regulatory networks and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The potential connection between inflammatory bowel disease and Alzheimer's disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plant-derived extracellular vesicles (PDEV) are emerging as natural nanomedicines for various diseases. Methods: We demonstrated that SEV exert potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages and Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells. Moreover, we assessed the therapeutic effects of SEV on dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced IBD in a murine model. Results: In inflamed RAW264.7, SEV modulated the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling axis to exert anti-inflammatory effects. They scavenged reactive oxygen species (ROS), restored mitochondrial membrane potential, upregulated the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, and suppressed the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. In Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells, SEV also repaired intestinal barrier function by restoring expression of the tight junction proteins Zonula Occludens-1 (ZO-1), Claudin-1, and Occludin (OCLN), alongside reduced TNF-α levels. In vivo, SEV accumulated at colonic inflammatory loci to effectively alleviate IBD, as evidenced by improved body weight and increased colon length. This protective effect was mediated through inhibition of the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling axis in colon tissues, which subsequently restored intestinal barrier integrity by increasing goblet cell numbers, upregulating OCLN proteins, and enhancing Mucin2 (MUC2) secretion, while simultaneously rebalancing inflammatory cytokines through suppression of TNF-α/IL-1β and promotion of IL-10 production. Conclusion: SEV have the potential to protect the colon against DSS-induced colitis by inhibiting the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway, providing a promising therapeutic candidate for IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.