ReviewSmart medicine2026
Hydrogels for Bone Repair: Construction Strategies and Applications.
Review in Smart medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Injectable ROS-Responsive Nanozyme Hydrogel Regulates the Uterine Microenvironment to Prevent Intrauterine Adhesions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Functional requirements and research advances of antimicrobial hydrogels for combat trauma wound repair].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- A Therapeutic Copper Hydrogel for Seborrheic Dermatitis: From Fungal Eradication to Skin Lesion Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone injuries, particularly those associated with an aging global population, pose a persistent and complex clinical challenge. Current gold-standard treatments such as autografts, allografts, and metal implants, are often limited by immune rejection and mechanical mismatch. In this context, hydrogels are promising biomaterials for bone regeneration, due not only to inherent biocompatibility, high hydration, and tunable elasticity but also to the ability to mimic the native bone micro environment. This review presents a critical and comprehensive analysis of how hydrogels for bone repair are designed, constructed, and functionalized to achieve the desired regenerative performance. It systematically examines multiple hydrogel types, centering on the design of their strength and biodegradation features to better align with the functional demands of bone healing. Furthermore, the review summarizes that by incorporating bioactive molecules, nanomaterials, or cells, advanced functionalization can orchestrate osteogenesis and angiogenesis. In vitro and in vivo studies evidenced the performance of hydrogels' applications ranging from bone fracture repair to smart, stimuli-responsive platforms for personalized regenerative medicine. This review finally identifies the prevailing translational challenges and suggests future research trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.