Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079424›Full record

ReviewSmart medicine2026

Hydrogels for Bone Repair: Construction Strategies and Applications.

Miaomiao Wang, Qianwei Su, Yuezhou Wu, Xiaoyi Liang, Fengjin Zhou, Yingying Jing, Zhanghua Li, Jiacan Su

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Smart medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Functional requirements and research advances of antimicrobial hydrogels for combat trauma wound repair].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miaomiao WangInstitute of Translational Medicine Shanghai University Shanghai China.
Qianwei SuDepartment of Polymer Science and Engineering ERC of Membrane Water Treatment (MOE), Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Synthesis and Functionalization (MOE) Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.
Yuezhou WuDepartment of Orthopedics Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China.
Xiaoyi LiangInstitute of Translational Medicine Shanghai University Shanghai China.
Fengjin ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics Honghui Hospital Xi'an Jiao Tong University Xi'an China.
Yingying JingInstitute of Translational Medicine Shanghai University Shanghai China.
Zhanghua LiDepartment of Orthopedics Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7718-8742
Jiacan SuInstitute of Translational Medicine Shanghai University Shanghai China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-263X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone injuries, particularly those associated with an aging global population, pose a persistent and complex clinical challenge. Current gold-standard treatments such as autografts, allografts, and metal implants, are often limited by immune rejection and mechanical mismatch. In this context, hydrogels are promising biomaterials for bone regeneration, due not only to inherent biocompatibility, high hydration, and tunable elasticity but also to the ability to mimic the native bone micro environment. This review presents a critical and comprehensive analysis of how hydrogels for bone repair are designed, constructed, and functionalized to achieve the desired regenerative performance. It systematically examines multiple hydrogel types, centering on the design of their strength and biodegradation features to better align with the functional demands of bone healing. Furthermore, the review summarizes that by incorporating bioactive molecules, nanomaterials, or cells, advanced functionalization can orchestrate osteogenesis and angiogenesis. In vitro and in vivo studies evidenced the performance of hydrogels' applications ranging from bone fracture repair to smart, stimuli-responsive platforms for personalized regenerative medicine. This review finally identifies the prevailing translational challenges and suggests future research trajectories.

Indexed as

angiogenesisbone regenerationhydrogelosteoimmunomodulationsmart‐responsive

Identifiers

PMID42079424
PMCPMC13131083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.