ArticleFujita medical journal2026
Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition by gender identity and sexual orientation: a survey of nursing students.
Article in Fujita medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Amid growing calls for respect for gender diversity, Japanese law restricts midwifery qualifications to women, excluding individuals assigned male at birth. By contrast, in some countries, all individuals can pursue midwifery qualifications regardless of gender. These differences highlight varying institutional frameworks and levels of social acceptance. To clarify nursing students' acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition across gender identities and sexual orientations. Methods: An anonymous online survey was conducted from April to May 2024 among 98 undergraduate nursing students (10 men and 88 women) enrolled at a single anonymous health sciences university in Japan. Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition was assessed using the proportion of positive evaluations for nine gender identity and sexual orientation categories. Evaluations were measured on a 4-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, and χ Results: Heterosexual women had the highest level of acceptance (96.9% positive evaluations), while heterosexual and bisexual men had the lowest (46.9%). There were substantial gender differences in the level of acceptance for different sexual orientations; however, none were statistically significant. Conclusion: Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition varied by gender identity and sexual orientation categories, suggesting that gender roles and cultural perspectives may influence attitudes. The findings indicate that systems should be reviewed to allow anyone, regardless of gender, to qualify and work as a midwife. They also highlight the importance of fostering an understanding of diversity through education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.