Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079385›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

Strategies for high-quality community-based participatory research partnerships in public health research.

Emily M D'Agostino, Rumour Piepenbrink, Lori Brand Bateman, Dana Keener Mast, Liliane Windsor, Debra Oto-Kent, Alan Wells, Jennifer Goldman, Jennifer Schuster, Rachel Kaufmann and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emily M D'AgostinoDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Rumour PiepenbrinkICF, Reston, VA, United States.
Lori Brand BatemanDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Dana Keener MastICF, Reston, VA, United States.
Liliane WindsorCase Western Research University, Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Debra Oto-KentHealth Education Council, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Alan WellsCommunity-Campus Partnerships for Health, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Jennifer GoldmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Jennifer SchusterDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Rachel KaufmannDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Rachel GurarieEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Miriam NuñoDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, UC Davis Health Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is grounded in trusting, reciprocal, and authentic relationships. We aimed to identify key strategies and actionable next steps to establish and sustain high-quality community-academic partnerships that foster community-based health equity. Study design: Qualitative thematic analysis. Methods: We analyzed three recorded discussions from a roundtable session with community and academic partners from the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics-Underserved Populations (RADx-UP) program (2020-2025), which supported 142 community-engaged public health research projects aimed at reducing COVID-19-related health inequities. Results: Key themes identified as most fundamental to support CBPR included establishing a long-term commitment, mutual co-learning among partners, flexible and sustained funding and resources, co-design of research and evaluation tools, and unwavering commitment to transparent communication and dissemination. Accurately assessing CBPR's impact requires using valid and reliable tools that assess whether community-academic partnerships are functioning well, identify opportunities to strengthen engagement, and measure both community- and system-level outcomes resulting from the partnerships. Conclusions: Advancing community-based health research through high-quality CBPR partnerships requires ongoing flexibility, mutual trust, shared learning, and collaborative design core elements to achieve sustainable and equitable public health outcomes. Through these initiatives we can pave the way for high-quality community-academic partnerships that address critical priorities in population health research and processes for advancing health equity.

Indexed as

Community based Participatory researchCommunity-engaged researchCOVID-19Health equityRADx-UPUnderserved populations

Identifiers

PMID42079385
PMCPMC13133940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.