ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Strategies for high-quality community-based participatory research partnerships in public health research.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The roadmap for community engagement: co-design and evaluation of a toolkit to strengthen community-academic research partnerships.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is grounded in trusting, reciprocal, and authentic relationships. We aimed to identify key strategies and actionable next steps to establish and sustain high-quality community-academic partnerships that foster community-based health equity. Study design: Qualitative thematic analysis. Methods: We analyzed three recorded discussions from a roundtable session with community and academic partners from the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics-Underserved Populations (RADx-UP) program (2020-2025), which supported 142 community-engaged public health research projects aimed at reducing COVID-19-related health inequities. Results: Key themes identified as most fundamental to support CBPR included establishing a long-term commitment, mutual co-learning among partners, flexible and sustained funding and resources, co-design of research and evaluation tools, and unwavering commitment to transparent communication and dissemination. Accurately assessing CBPR's impact requires using valid and reliable tools that assess whether community-academic partnerships are functioning well, identify opportunities to strengthen engagement, and measure both community- and system-level outcomes resulting from the partnerships. Conclusions: Advancing community-based health research through high-quality CBPR partnerships requires ongoing flexibility, mutual trust, shared learning, and collaborative design core elements to achieve sustainable and equitable public health outcomes. Through these initiatives we can pave the way for high-quality community-academic partnerships that address critical priorities in population health research and processes for advancing health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.