Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079373›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2026

Milkability in dam-calf contact systems.

Julia Rell, Katharina A Zipp, Cornelia Buchli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia RellCentre for Dam-Calf Contact Rearing (Fachstelle MuKa), Horgen, 8810, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2019-5963
Katharina A ZippOrganic Agricultural Sciences, Farm Animal Behaviour and Husbandry Section, University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, 37213, Germany.
Cornelia BuchliCentre for Dam-Calf Contact Rearing (Fachstelle MuKa), Horgen, 8810, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dam-calf contact (DCC) rearing is a form of cow-calf contact (CCC) in which dairy cows nurse their calves for some months until weaning while additionally being milked throughout lactation. Growing implementation, consumer demands, and research interest indicate that CCC and DCC are viable systems for the dairy industry. However, machine milking in these systems presents notable challenges with multifactorial drivers. Those are discussed in this review based on current scientific knowledge regarding milking in nursing dams: Machine milk yield (MMY), flow and fat content of the harvested milk are reduced compared to non-nursing controls while protein and lactose levels vary and udder health is unaffected or improved. In systems with full-time DCC, relative MMY reduction can reach 60-70% during the nursing period whereas highly restrictive suckling regimes cause smaller MMY losses but may not meet the calf's nutritional needs. Post-weaning and lactation MMY can be reduced or unaffected. Low udder fills at the start of milking delay milk let-down potentially conflicting with standardized milking procedures and machine settings. A 0.5-1.5% decline in milk fat concentration indicates incomplete milk ejection and incomplete udder emptying which can further reduce MMY. These effects likely reflect a disturbance of the milk ejection reflex, as in nursing dams, suckling is a more potential stimulus for oxytocin (OT) release than milking. Underlying central mechanisms of inhibited OT release at milking in nursing dams may be related to the cow-calf bond affecting the dams' oxytocinergic system but the complexity of required experimental set-ups compromises research in cattle. In bonded dams, multisensory stimulation by the calf may be a stronger trigger for OT release than the milking procedure. Further, separation from the calf during milking and dam-individual variation regarding the ability to release milk in response to machine stimulation may play a role. Zooming out, social scientific studies reveal that DCC farmers see poor milkability as an unsolved challenge. However, it is not limited to nursing dams, as stress affects milk ejection. To quantify incomplete udder emptying, research should refine strip milk fat analysis for on-farm use. Cow-individual milk ejection dynamics must be better understood to assess if breeding for better milk let-down in response to machine milking while maintaining good maternity traits can improve milkability in DCC systems.

Indexed as

Cow-calf contactmilkabilitymilk ejectionnursingoxytocinsuckling

Identifiers

PMID42079373
PMCPMC13131941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.