ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Comparative Evaluation of Buccal Cortical Bone Thickness in the Posterior Mandible Across Skeletal Patterns: A CBCT Study in a Sample of Iranians.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Buccal Cortical Bone Thickness in the Posterior Mandible Across Skeletal Patterns: A CBCT Study in a Sample of Iranians.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, cortical buccal bone thickness between posterior teeth was assessed at 4 and 7 mm distances from the alveolar crest using CBCT images of 112 Iranian participants aged 18-60 years. Participants were classified into six groups: Class I normal angle, Class I low angle, Class I high angle, Class II normal angle, Class II low angle, and Class II high angle. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene's test, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), paired-sample Results: Cortical bone thickness generally increased from anterior to posterior regions and from the alveolar crest toward the basal jaw in Class II and both high- and low-angle groups, with exceptions observed in Class I and normal-angle individuals. Statistically significant differences in cortical bone thickness were observed between Class I and Class II skeletal patterns at specific posterior sites, with Class I individuals consistently exhibiting greater thickness. Differences related to vertical skeletal pattern were limited, observed only at the distal canine (4-mm level). Sex, age, and side-to-side differences influenced cortical thickness in certain regions, with slightly greater thickness on the left side at some measurement sites. Conclusions: Buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible varies significantly with the sagittal skeletal pattern, whereas the vertical skeletal pattern has minimal influence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.