ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Comparative Mapping of Functional and Structural Homologies in the Pig and Human Brain.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative mapping of functional and structural homologies across humans, small animals, and nonhuman primates has been extensively pursued due to its strong translational relevance. However, these experimental models possess inherent limitations in fully recapitulating the complexity of human cortical organization. The porcine model has recently emerged as a promising alternative, given its neuroanatomical and physiological similarities to the human brain. Despite these advantages, systematic cross-species characterization of functional and structural homologies between humans and pigs remains largely understudied. In the present study, we acquired resting-state functional MRI and diffusion MRI data from pigs and analyzed them alongside corresponding human datasets to investigate cross-species correspondence in large-scale brain organization. First, to enhance functional network alignment across species, group independent component analysis was performed separately within each species to identify intrinsic large-scale functional networks. Our results demonstrated that multiple canonical human resting-state networks are represented in the porcine brain, including sensorimotor, default mode, cerebellar, frontal, and central executive networks. Moreover, we observed significant cross-species concordance in intrinsic functional architecture across multiple distributed networks, both in spatial distribution and temporal patterns, indicating homologous large-scale brain organization between pigs and humans. Second, we conducted comparative structural analyses using tractography derived from diffusion MRI and color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps to examine white matter geometry in pigs and humans. Cross-species comparison revealed substantial similarities in major white matter pathways and their spatial organization, supporting structural correspondence at the level of tract geometry. Together, these findings underscore the translational value of the porcine model as a robust and neurobiologically relevant platform for investigating human brain function, structural organization, and related neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.