ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Delineating the Transcriptional and Phenotypic Impact from Biotherapeutic Glycoengineering.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glycosylation is critical to biopharmaceutical activity, stability, and pharmacokinetics. While production cells can be engineered to produce better protein glycoforms, glycans decorate thousands of host cell proteins, and it remains unclear how glycoengineering impacts the host cell. To decipher the cell response to glycoengineering, we studied a library of 166 glycoengineered CHO-K1 cell clones representing 54 different glycosyltransferase modifications. Through integrated analysis of glycomics, RNA-Seq, and phenotypic data, we discovered that glycoengineered mutants clustered into three distinct groups (wild-type-like, Moderate, and Substantial) based on their glycosylation patterns. Different glycosyltransferase families exhibited distinct phenotypic signatures: St3gal modifications increased growth rate and cell density, B4galt knockouts affected cell size, and Mgat knockouts enhanced cell viability. Notably, we found specific cellular reprogramming associated with each glycosyltransferase family, including alterations in energy metabolism, stress responses, and DNA repair mechanisms. These findings were validated in an independent set of 30 glycoengineered CHO-S cell lines, expressing a panel of 10 recombinant proteins. Our extensive analysis reveals phenotypic changes resulting from glycoengineering, identifies their molecular bases, and provides crucial insights for controlling glycosylation during therapeutic protein production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.