ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Evaluating splicing factor and kinase network crosstalk through global phosphoproteomics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Both splicing and kinase signaling are biochemical processes that fundamentally determine and shape cell physiology. Although there has been some indication that there is an interaction between the two - splicing can alter the availability of exons encoding kinase targets and kinases can phosphorylate splicing factors - it has yet to be established the extent to which altering splicing factor expression impacts kinase signaling networks. In this work, we implemented a data-driven analysis using ENCODE RNA-sequencing data and prior work mapping post-translational modifications onto splice events to identify candidate splice factor perturbations that show extensive alterations to phosphorylation-encoding protein products. We then replicated the ENCODE knockdown experiments and performed global phosphoproteomics for two candidates, U2AF1 and SRSF3, complementing the transcription-level data. Both knockdowns showed extensive changes in phosphorylation and kinase activities, both basally and upon receptor tyrosine kinase stimulation. U2AF1 knockdown drove decreased JNK-associated cell death signaling but elevated chromosome regulation through CSNK2A1, PLK, and EIF2AK4 activity. SRSF3 knockdown, on the other hand, led to decreased cell cycle signaling through CDK and HIPK2 but increased cytoskeletal signaling through various PAKs. In addition, we found a striking enrichment of phosphorylated splicing regulators in both knockdowns that were linked to their splicing activity, such as HNRNPC, suggesting potential feedback and crosstalk between splice factors through signaling pathway activation. Importantly, comparison of differential phosphorylation measurements from this study to mRNA expression and splicing measurements from ENCODE revealed significant knockdown-dependent protein regulation, not captured by transcriptomic measurements alone, underscoring the value of phosphoproteomic profiling after splice factor perturbations. Combined, the transcriptomics and phosphoproteomics reveal deep interconnection between the two processes that are relevant to understanding cell signaling in health and disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.