Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079235›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Circadian modulation of spontaneous dopamine release shapes reward-evoked signaling in the nucleus accumbens.

Jordan N Cook, Mikael Gevorgyan, Jason Armitage, Jeff R Jones

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan N CookInstitute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Mikael GevorgyanInstitute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Jason ArmitageDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Jeff R JonesInstitute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

Circadian output mechanisms in nocturnal and diurnal animalsR35GM151020 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY R JONES · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian system is an important regulator of reward-related neural function and behavior. Dopamine (DA) release in the nucleus accumbens is a key component of reward processing, yet how circadian timing shapes DA release in relation to reward behavior remains unclear. Here, we investigated circadian rhythms in DA release and reward behavior using long-term fiber photometry paired with an automated reward delivery and measurement system. We found two distinct circadian rhythms in DA release: spontaneous DA, reflecting ongoing DA release not associated with reward, and reward-evoked DA, reflecting transient DA response during reward. Spontaneous DA peaked during the early subjective day, whereas reward-evoked peak DA peaked near the day-to-night transition. Both rhythms were distinct from reward behavior, which peaked during the early subjective night. Linear modeling further showed that the relationship between reward-evoked DA and reward behavior depended on circadian time, with greater DA responses occurring between late subjective day and early subjective night. Spontaneous baseline and reward-evoked DA were also negatively correlated, and this relationship was likewise modulated across circadian time. Together, these findings support a model in which circadian modulation of baseline DA may alter the gain of reward-evoked signaling, amplifying DA responses across behaviorally relevant times of day.

Identifiers

PMID42079235
PMCPMC13131462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.