ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A fast-to-faithful transition shapes the DNA repair landscape during embryogenesis.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and timely repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential for genome maintenance in all cells. Embryos are particularly vulnerable to DSBs. During zebrafish development, a single fertilized cell undergoes rapid divisions to form an embryo of 50,000 cells in the first 24 hours, subjecting its genome to intense replication stress and the inevitable formation of genomic DSBs. While we know that failure to repair these breaks can result in embryonic lethality, the kinetics, fidelity, and pathway choice of DSB repair during embryogenesis are not well understood. Here, we used light-activated CRISPR to generate targeted genomic DSBs across zebrafish embryo development. Importantly, DSB induction occurs within seconds after light stimulation, enabling precise measurements of repair kinetics within a single cell cycle. We found that DSBs were repaired within 15 minutes during the early, rapid-division stages. At later stages, the pace of DNA repair declines as the cell cycle slows. By leveraging mathematical modeling and mutants that disrupt DNA repair pathways, we uncovered a developmental transition from error-prone microhomology-mediated end joining to more faithful non-homologous end joining that correlates with the gradual shift in repair kinetics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to resolve DSB repair dynamics with high temporal resolution during embryo development. Our study establishes a framework for systematically interrogating the cellular responses to DNA damage in living model organisms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.