ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
GNOMES: an integrated framework for genome-wide normalization and differential binding analysis of CUT&RUN and ChIP-seq data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Despite their use, quantitative comparison of epigenomic datasets such as ChIP-seq and CUT&RUN remains challenging, particularly due to difficulties in signal normalization across samples and conditions. Normalization solely based on sequencing depth is often insufficient due to the high variability in signal-to-noise ratios across samples, even from a same experiment. While exogeneous spike-in normalization can address some issues, robust spike-in controls are not always available, and may introduce additional experimental burden and computational complexity. Furthermore, normalization and differential binding analysis are typically performed using separate bioinformatics tools. Indeed, most differential analysis frameworks operate on raw count matrices, preventing users from visually inspecting normalized signal tracks and evaluating how normalization influences the results. To overcome these challenges, we developed Results: Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.