Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079121›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Systematic evaluation of 24 extraction and library preparation combinations for metagenomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Kenin Qian, Varada Abhyankar, Dahlia Keo, Payton Zarceno, Traci Toy, Eleazar Eskin, Valerie A Arboleda

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kenin QianDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-6207
Varada AbhyankarDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2719-4901
Dahlia KeoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Payton ZarcenoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Traci ToyDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eleazar EskinDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Valerie A ArboledaDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM008042 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AJIJOLA, OLUJIMI A, DAWSON, DAVID WAYNE · 1985 to 2023
$29.9M
UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM152342 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Olujimi A Ajijola, David Wayne Dawson · 2024 to 2026
$5.3M
Expanding Swabseq sequencing technology to enable readiness for emerging pathogensR01AI177859 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, ELEAZAR ESKIN · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI177859NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008042NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequencing the respiratory tract transcriptome has the potential to provide insights into infectious pathogens and the host's immune response. While DNA-based sequencing is more standard in clinical laboratories due to its stability, RNA assays offer unique advantages. RNA reflects dynamic physiological changes, and for RNA viruses, viral RNA particles directly represent copies of the viral genome, enabling greater diagnostic sensitivity. However, RNA's susceptibility to degradation remains a significant challenge, particularly in RNase-rich specimens like saliva. To address this, we conducted a systematic, combinatorial evaluation of 24 distinct mNGS workflows, crossing eight nucleic acid extraction methods with three RNA-Seq library preparation protocols. Remnant saliva samples (n = 6) were pooled and spiked with MS2 phage as a control. The SARS-CoV-2 virus was spiked into half of the samples, which were extracted using the eight different extraction methods (n = 3) and compared using RNA Integrity Number equivalent (RINe) scores and RNA concentration. The extracted RNA was then processed across the three library construction methods and subjected to short-read sequencing to assess all 24 combinations head-to-head. We compared methods based on viral read recovery and found that RINe and concentration did not correlate with viral detection. The Zymo Quick-RNA Magbead kit and the Tecan Revelo RNA-Seq High-Sensitivity RNA library kit were the extraction and library-preparation kits that yielded the most SARS-CoV-2 reads, respectively. Importantly, our combinatorial analysis revealed that any small variability attributable to different nucleic acid extraction methods was heavily overshadowed by differences in quality attributable to the RNA-Seq library preparation methods. These findings challenge the reliance on conventional RNA quality metrics for clinical metagenomics and underscore the need to redefine extraction quality standards for mNGS applications.

Indexed as

nucleic acid extractionRNA extractionRNA-sequencingRNA-virus

Identifiers

PMID42079121
PMCPMC13131768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.