ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
An integrated workflow for long-term fiber photometry analysis.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-term fiber photometry enables measurement of neural dynamics across hours to days, but these recordings create analytical and reproducibility challenges that are not well addressed by tools developed for short, stimulus-locked experiments. Here we present a software environment for long-term photometry analysis organized around a structured, revisitable workflow for run execution, inspection, and post-run refinement. The software separates correction retuning from downstream event reanalysis, allowing both signal correction and event-analysis settings to be revised after the initial run. We show that correction choice can substantially change the corrected signal itself and that post-run reanalysis can revise event-detection outcomes. The software also preserves tonic and phasic outputs and supports inspection of the same recording at both multiday and session-level scales. Together, these capabilities provide a practical workflow for more interpretable, revisitable, and reproducible analysis of long-term photometry recordings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.