ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A Deep Learning-Based Scoring Framework for Large-Scale Multi-Donor Cardiotoxicity Screening.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiotoxicity remains a major cause of drug attrition and post-market withdrawal, yet the vast majority of environmental chemicals to which humans may be exposed remain uncharacterized for cardiotoxicity risk. Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based testing has been proposed to address this gap. Here we present an unsupervised deep learning framework for multi-donor cardiotoxicity screening using high-throughput calcium transient recordings from hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). We used data from a library of 1,029 compounds that were tested in hiPSC-CM from five donors in concentration-response. An autoencoder trained exclusively on baseline signals quantified chemical-induced functional perturbations through reconstruction error, bypassing the need for labeled training data while capturing the full spectrum of calcium handling disruptions. Using this framework, we generated effect levels. Aggregation of donor-specific scores revealed substantial inter-individual variability in potential cardiotoxicity, underscoring the value of this approach for population-level risk prediction. We found that microbiocides, dyes, and pesticides to have potential concern, characterized by high toxicity scores and low inter-donor variability. This framework establishes a scalable, human-relevant, and genetically diverse platform for cardiotoxicity surveillance across both pharmacological and environmental chemical spaces, with direct implications for drug and chemical safety evaluation and prioritization for additional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.