ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Deep-learning-assisted simulation of a cortical circuit: integrating anatomy, physiology and function.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanistic understanding of the brain requires models constrained by anatomy, physiology, and functional activity. We present a differentiable simulator and a ~67,000-neuron model of mouse primary visual cortex that integrates multimodal data, including electron-microscopy connectomics, multipatch synaptic physiology, cell-type-resolved intrinsic electrophysiology, and large-scale Neuropixels recordings from diverse cell types. End-to-end training completes on a single GPU in ~6.5 hours while preserving biological constraints. Networks trained only on brief drifting-grating responses reproduce cell-type-specific benchmarks and generalize to new contrasts and natural scenes. We uncover heterogeneous cell-type- and tuning-dependent synaptic organization and show that training preferentially sculpts inhibitory connectivity into distinct cohorts that exert outsized control over network activity. Targeted ablations show that removing biological priors on synaptic weight distributions can preserve functional activity yet disrupt emergent wiring rules. The freely shared models and code facilitate differentiable simulations as a computationally practical framework for studying brain circuit function and mechanisms under biological constraints.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.