Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079013›Full record

ArticleCEUR workshop proceedings.2025

Werner Ceusters, Alan Ruttenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CEUR workshop proceedings., 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Werner CeustersUniversity at Buffalo, 77 Goodell street, Buffalo NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2676-8689
Alan RuttenbergNational Center for Ontological Research, 126 Park Hall, Buffalo NY 14260, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1604-3078

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
CTSA UM1 State University of New York at BuffaloUM1TR005296 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI Sanjay Sethi · 2025 to 2026
$8.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR005296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Basic Formal Ontology's (BFO) current approach to 'history', in contradistinction to how the referent of 'history' has been described in scholarly work upon which the BFO is built, is quite reductionist: it allows only material entities to have a history, and what contributes to their histories is restricted to what takes place in the spatiotemporal region 'occupied by' the material parts. This has as one consequence that certain processes in which a material entity participates are not part of its history. In addition, the BFO is silent about whether instances of other types of continuants have a 'history'. We explore how this situation came to be and propose two alternative versions for 'history' inclusive to all sorts of continuants currently recognized by the BFO.

Indexed as

Basic Formal Ontologychangehistory

Identifiers

PMID42079013
PMCPMC13134819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.