ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Effects of dietary fermented passion fruit (
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Passion fruit peel is a common byproduct of industrial passion fruit processing, yet it serves as a valuable source of diverse bioactive compounds and nutrients. However, limited attention has been paid in the literature to the nutritional properties and practical applications of passion fruit peel. This study aimed to examine the effect of fermented passion fruit peel (FPFP) on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota of Lingshan broilers. A total of 400 female Lingshan broilers were randomly allocated to four groups with five replicates per group and 20 birds per replicate. The control group (CK) was fed a basal diet, while the experimental groups had 5% (L5), 10% (L10), and 15% (L15) of the basal diet replaced with FPFP. Growth performance and intestinal morphology were determined, and the cecal microbial community was analyzed via 16S rRNA sequencing. The results demonstrated that the 10% inclusion yielded optimal outcomes. Compared to all other groups, the 10% group exhibited significantly higher final body weight, total weight gain, and average daily gain (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.