ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Body composition-based nutritional status during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its association with relative dose intensity and hematologic toxicity in patients with gastric cancer.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated changes in body composition before and after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastric cancer and explored the relationships between these changes, relative dose intensity (RDI), and hematological toxicity. Methods: Body composition parameters (muscle mass, skeletal muscle mass, body fat mass, visceral fat area, and water content) were measured via an InBody 720 analyzer before and after treatment. The primary outcome was a reduced RDI (<85%), and the secondary outcome was Grade 2 or 3 hematological toxicity. Results: Patients with a reduced RDI (<85%) presented significant decreases in muscle mass, skeletal muscle mass, and total body water content after therapy and had longer treatment duration. Greater muscle mass, skeletal muscle mass, and total body water content were associated with lower risks of reduced RDI [OR: 0.808 (0.697-0.938)], [OR: 0.699 (0.545-0.897)], and [OR: 0.759 (0.626-0.920)], respectively. Grade 2 thrombocytopenia was associated with reduced muscle mass and total body water, as well as increased body fat mass and visceral fat area. In further regression analyses, greater skeletal muscle mass was associated with a lower risk of grade 2 thrombocytopenia [OR: 0.657 (0.434-0.996)]. Conclusion: Higher muscle mass and total body water were associated with a lower risk of reduced RDI, whereas body fat mass showed no significant association. Regarding hematologic toxicity, grade 2 thrombocytopenia was associated with adverse changes in body composition, and greater skeletal muscle mass was associated with a lower risk in the adjusted analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.