ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2026
Dual Plating with 4.5mm PHILOS for Managing Challenging Humerus Shaft Non-Unions: A Novel Technique.
Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fixation failures of humeral shaft fractures are uncommon. When they do occur, revision fixation can be challenging. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a novel surgical technique for managing challenging humerus midshaft fractures and non-unions, specifically assessing union and complication rates. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation of midshaft humerus fractures using our novel dual plating technique between October 2016 and July 2019. Six patients were included. At follow-up, union was assessed using plain films. Results: Mean age was 50.8 ± 18.0 years, including 4 males and 2 females. All surgeries were revision fixations except for one primary fixation. Mean follow-up period was 6.5 ± 2.3 months. At final follow-up, 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) achieved clinical and radiographic union, with a mean time to union of 6.4 ± 2.0 months. Residual angular deformity at union averaged 1.2 ± 0.8° in the coronal plane and 2.0 ± 2.0° in the sagittal plane. Aside from one case of delayed union, no major complications were reported. Conclusion: The novel dual plating technique can be reliably executed with good results and shows promise as a surgical treatment option for non-union or implant failure. While particularly valuable in revision settings, it may be considered for challenging primary fixations. Further research is needed before recommending its widespread use in primary fracture management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.