Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078980›Full record

ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2026

Post-traumatic Patellar Tendon Repair with Ipsilateral Peroneus Tendon Augmentation Post Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

S Bhattacharjee, A Prasad, A Ahlawat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S BhattacharjeeRobotic Joint Replacement Unit, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, India.
A PrasadDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sarvodaya Hospital, Faridabad, India.
A AhlawatDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sarvodaya Hospital, Faridabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patellar tendon rupture is an uncommon but serious complication that results in loss of knee extension during and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), significantly impacting the patient's quality of life. Various surgical treatments, ranging from initial repair to reconstruction, are available and accessible. In recent years, the peroneus longus tendon autograft has been utilised to restore the knee extensor system. The purpose of this case report was to present the case of a patient who had a traumatic patellar tendon rupture following TKA and requiring surgery along with peroneus tendon augmentation. A 71-year-old woman underwent bilateral robotic-assisted cruciate retaining TKA for a Grade IV arthritic knee. Post surgery, on day five patient had a history of a fall at home, following which she was unable to extend her knees. On evaluation through ultrasonography and radiographs, she was found to have a ruptured patellar tendon and sprain of the medial collateral ligament. Primary repair of the tendon along with augmentation with the peroneus tendon was performed, and the patient was followed for 12 months, at the end of which, the patient was able to achieve a good functional outcome. In conclusion, early results from patellar tendon reconstruction using an ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon autograft following TKA suggest that this technique is effective for managing acute post-traumatic patellar tendon rupture. It facilitates early recovery, yields favourable outcomes, and may reduce the risk of infection.

Indexed as

ipsilateral peroneus tendonknee traumamedial collateral ligamentpatellar tendon rupturetotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42078980
PMCPMC13133584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.