Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078962›Full record

ArticleEngineering fracture mechanics2025

Effect of strain rate on tensile test results in hydrogen and other concerns.

M L Martin, Z N Buck, A C Eckhardt, D S Lauria, A J Slifka, M J Connolly

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Engineering fracture mechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M L MartinMaterials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, MS 647, Boulder, CO 80305, United States.
Z N BuckMaterials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, MS 647, Boulder, CO 80305, United States.
A C EckhardtMaterials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, MS 647, Boulder, CO 80305, United States.
D S LauriaMaterials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, MS 647, Boulder, CO 80305, United States.
A J SlifkaMaterials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, MS 647, Boulder, CO 80305, United States.
M J ConnollyMaterials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, MS 647, Boulder, CO 80305, United States.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tensile tests of an X52 pipeline steel were conducted in air and in hydrogen gas at strain rates covering five orders of magnitude. Properties such as elastic modulus, yield strength, and ultimate tensile strength were unaffected by hydrogen or by strain rate. Ductility was greatly reduced in hydrogen, compared to in-air, with a moderate decrease of ductility with decreasing strain rate. Different methods of calculating the ductility, such as elongation to failure and reduction in area, are discussed, as are the consequences of these methods on the calculated Hydrogen Embrittlement Index.

Indexed as

FractureHydrogen embrittlementMechanical propertiesSteelTensile testing

Identifiers

PMID42078962
PMCPMC13131991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.