Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078961›Full record

ReviewMRS energy & sustainability : a review journal2026

Exploring the current engineering challenges of solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries with fundamental materials science: A review.

Jun Yao Andrew Wong, James Moloney, Zhuangnan Li, Ziwei Jeffrey Yang, Yan Wang, Manish Chhowalla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MRS energy & sustainability : a review journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun Yao Andrew Wong *Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge, CB3 0FS UK.ORCID 0009-0008-7529-058X
James Moloney *Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge, CB3 0FS UK.
Zhuangnan LiDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge, CB3 0FS UK.
Ziwei Jeffrey YangDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge, CB3 0FS UK.
Yan WangDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge, CB3 0FS UK.
Manish ChhowallaDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge, CB3 0FS UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8183-4044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Lithium sulfur batteries offer high theoretical energy density and low material cost, but their practical use depends on electrolyte systems that satisfy several fundamental criteria. Solid state electrolytes provide a promising route by removing the liquid phase and improving safety. This review outlines the reaction pathways in lithium sulfur cells and the mechanisms of ion transport in solid electrolytes, followed by a generational comparison of major electrolyte classes, including polymers, oxides, sulfides, halides, garnets and composite systems. Four key criteria for solid state electrolyte use in lithium sulfur batteries are then examined: stability with electrodes, polysulfide behaviour, sulfur utilization and mechanical versatility. Existing strategies are evaluated in terms of how effectively they satisfy each requirement. Finally, two solid state cell designs that meet all identified criteria are proposed, together with quantitative considerations for electrolyte and cathode design. These insights provide a framework for guiding the development of practical solid state lithium sulfur batteries. Highlights: This work identifies the key requirements that solid electrolytes must meet to enable high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries. It also highlights two practical cell designs that satisfy these requirements and point toward viable solid-state lithium-sulfur technology. Discussions: The lack of quantitative data on polysulfide solubility in solid polymers remains a major barrier to rational design of solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries, raising the question of whether industry should invest heavily in this chemistry before these fundamentals are resolved.Although solid electrolytes are widely promoted as a safer alternative to liquid systems, their real-world reliability against lithium dendrites remains unsettled, especially under manufacturing imperfections and high-power operating conditions.The practical energy and sustainability benefits of solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries depend not only on materials breakthroughs but also on whether new manufacturing lines-potentially requiring ceramic processing and polymer casting hybrids-can be deployed at commercial scale without prohibitive cost or environmental burden. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

ceramiccompositeenergy storageionic conductorpolymer

Identifiers

PMID42078961
PMCPMC13132942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.