ArticleTheoretical and applied mechanics letters2026
Hybridndiff-UQ: Uncertainty quantification for hybrid neural differentiable modeling.
Article in Theoretical and applied mechanics letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DiFVM: A Vectorized Graph-Based Finite Volume Solver for Differentiable CFD on Unstructured Meshes.Journal of computational physics · 2027Article
- Assessment of uncertainty quantification in universal differential equations.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hybrid neural differentiable models mark a significant advancement in the field of scientific machine learning. These models, integrating numerical representations of known physics into deep neural networks, offer enhanced predictive capabilities and show great potential for data-driven modeling of complex physical systems. However, a critical and yet unaddressed challenge lies in the quantification of inherent uncertainties stemming from multiple sources. Addressing this gap, we introduce a novel method, uncertainty quantification for hybrid neural differentiable modeling, for effective and efficient uncertainty propagation and estimation in hybrid neural differentiable models, leveraging the strengths of deep ensemble Bayesian learning and nonlinear transformations. Specifically, our approach effectively discerns and quantifies both aleatoric uncertainties, arising from data noise, and epistemic uncertainties, resulting from model-form discrepancies and data sparsity. This is achieved within a Bayesian model averaging framework, where aleatoric uncertainties are modeled through hybrid neural models. The unscented transformation plays a pivotal role in enabling the flow of these uncertainties through the nonlinear functions within the hybrid model. In contrast, epistemic uncertainties are estimated using an ensemble of stochastic gradient descent trajectories. This approach offers a practical approximation to the posterior distribution of both the network parameters and the physical parameters. Notably, our framework is designed for simplicity in implementation and high scalability, making it suitable for parallel computing environments. The merits of the proposed method have been demonstrated through problems governed by both ordinary and partial differentiable equations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.