ArticleResearch square2026
Comparative analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and breast cancer screening practices among women in South Africa and the United States: a multinational study.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer screening is an effective prevention strategy, yet global disparities in uptake persist across and within countries from varying human development index contexts. This study compares breast cancer screening-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among US and SA women. Methods: Cross-sectional studies were conducted among 2000 age-matched SA and US women. Sociodemographic data, knowledge, attitudes, and screening practice, were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression associations between screening behaviors (ever screened, clinical breast examination (CBE), mammography) and predictors were determined. Results: US women had greater breast cancer knowledge and were more likely to participate in screening (ever screened AOR = 2.078, p < 0.001, CBE AOR = 2.741, p < 0.001, and mammography AOR = 3.712, p < 0.001). SA women perceived breast cancer to be less serious than US women, but perceived greater benefits and self-efficacy for breast self-examination and greater cues to action. Screening uptake was mainly associated with availability of screening services; knowledge, family history of breast cancer, older age, tertiary education, marital status and good health also contributed to increased screening behavior. Unexpectedly, stigma associated with increased perceived benefits of screening and screening practice and self-efficacy for BSE and cues to action. Conclusions: Tailored interventions should incorporate structural investments and stigma-sensitive education to increase screening participation. SA should prioritize increasing community knowledge and expanding CBE into communities and primary health care. US policies should focus on marginalized minority groups through insurance expansion, navigation support, and tailored outreach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.