Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078899›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Comparative analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and breast cancer screening practices among women in South Africa and the United States: a multinational study.

Monica Ewomazino Akokuwebe, Wenlong Carl Chen, Raylton Chikwati, Rebaone Petlele, Olaide Ojoniyi, Daniel S O'Neil, Shane Norris, Maureen Joffe

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monica Ewomazino AkokuwebeSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand.
Wenlong Carl ChenSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand.
Raylton ChikwatiSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand.
Rebaone PetleleSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand.
Olaide OjoniyiSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand.
Daniel S O'NeilYale Cancer Center, Yale University, and Yale School of Medicine, Yale University.
Shane NorrisSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand.
Maureen JoffeSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand.

Funding

Novel predictors of survival among breast cancer patients with/without HIV in South AfricaR01CA250012 · NCI · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI CUBASCH, HERBERT, EL-SADR, WAFAA M. · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
HIV's Effects on Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in South AfricaR01CA192627 · NCI · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI JACOBSON, JUDITH S, JOFFE, MAUREEN · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA192627NCI NIH HHS R01 CA250012Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer screening is an effective prevention strategy, yet global disparities in uptake persist across and within countries from varying human development index contexts. This study compares breast cancer screening-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among US and SA women. Methods: Cross-sectional studies were conducted among 2000 age-matched SA and US women. Sociodemographic data, knowledge, attitudes, and screening practice, were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression associations between screening behaviors (ever screened, clinical breast examination (CBE), mammography) and predictors were determined. Results: US women had greater breast cancer knowledge and were more likely to participate in screening (ever screened AOR = 2.078, p < 0.001, CBE AOR = 2.741, p < 0.001, and mammography AOR = 3.712, p < 0.001). SA women perceived breast cancer to be less serious than US women, but perceived greater benefits and self-efficacy for breast self-examination and greater cues to action. Screening uptake was mainly associated with availability of screening services; knowledge, family history of breast cancer, older age, tertiary education, marital status and good health also contributed to increased screening behavior. Unexpectedly, stigma associated with increased perceived benefits of screening and screening practice and self-efficacy for BSE and cues to action. Conclusions: Tailored interventions should incorporate structural investments and stigma-sensitive education to increase screening participation. SA should prioritize increasing community knowledge and expanding CBE into communities and primary health care. US policies should focus on marginalized minority groups through insurance expansion, navigation support, and tailored outreach.

Indexed as

Attitudes, and PracticesBreast cancer screeningKnowledgeSouth AfricaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42078899
PMCPMC13131885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.