ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Physical models and simulators in veterinary education: current status, learning impact, and future perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Veterinary education is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by the increasing integration of physical models and simulation-based training into academic curricula. This review highlights the evolving role of these tools in veterinary programs, encompassing both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The authors describe and categorize the differences between models and simulators and explore their global and temporal adoption. It describes the application across disciplines and their ability to replicate clinical scenarios, surgical procedures, and diagnostic techniques, also differentiating between students targeted (veterinary medicine training vs. veterinary surgeons). It then evaluates evidence for their educational effectiveness across veterinary disciplines, including comparative analyses with traditional teaching methods when available. Across multiple domains, model and simulation-based training demonstrates equivalent or superior short-term learning outcomes, particularly for anatomy, procedural skills, selected surgical techniques, and emergency interventions, while also offering benefits such as standardized learning experiences, individual satisfaction and reduced learner anxiety. The authors delve into the key challenges of physical models and simulation-based training as well as current limitations of these tools, and future perspectives in development and use of new models for teaching. Ultimately, simulation represents a paradigm shift in veterinary education, aligning ethical responsibility with academic excellence and clinical preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.