ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Deep learning accurately and reliably segments pelvic vascular structure in CT scans of gynecologic cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Craniofacial Artery Segmentation with Vessel Enhancement-Guided Deep Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate identification of pelvic vascular structures is critical for safe and effective gynecologic cancer surgery, yet intraoperative recognition of the internal iliac artery, its branches, and corresponding venous pathways remains challenging due to complex anatomy and inter-individual variability. This study investigates the feasibility of fully automated, multi-class segmentation of both major pelvic vessels and smaller branches of the internal iliac artery and internal iliac vein using the nnU-Net v2 deep learning framework. Methods: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography datasets from 47 patients were used for model training and evaluation. The nnU-Net v2 deep learning framework was employed to perform fully automated segmentation across nine vascular categories. These targets included major vessels, the internal iliac artery and vein, and an "other vessels" category consolidating surgically critical smaller branches, such as the obturator, uterine, and gluteal vessels. Model performance was quantitatively evaluated against ground truth annotations using the Dice Similarity Coefficient and Mean Surface Distance. Results: The model achieved high segmentation accuracy for large-diameter vessels such as the aorta and iliac arteries, with average Dice similarity coefficients exceeding 0.83 for arterial structures and 0.75 for venous structures. Smaller branches exhibited lower overlap scores but maintained anatomically coherent and clinically recognizable patterns, particularly for the obturator and gluteal arteries. Discussion: These findings demonstrate the potential of automated 3D vascular segmentation to enhance preoperative planning, anatomical education, and intraoperative safety in complex pelvic procedures. Furthermore, this represents the first systematic evaluation of the segmentation of major branches of the internal iliac artery in gynecologic oncology patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.