ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2026
Validation of NT-proBNP cutoff points for heart failure diagnosis in adults with CHD in the outpatient clinic and emergency department.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Empirical data support the use of N-terminal pro-B-type brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for heart failure (HF) rule-in and rule-out in patients with acquired heart disease, but similar data are lacking in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). The purpose of this study was to assess diagnostic performance of conventional NT-proBNP cutoff points for HF diagnosis (rule-in and rule-out) in adults with CHD. Method: Retrospective study of adults with CHD and NT-proBNP measurement in the outpatient clinic (outpatient cohort) or in the emergency department (ED) (2003-2023). HF diagnosis was based on clinical assessment at the time of NT-proBNP measurement. Logistic regression was used to assess the diagnostic performance of conventional NT-proBNP cutoff points (<125 pg/ml for HF rule-out and ≥250 pg/ml for HF rule-in in the outpatient setting; <300 pg/ml for HF rule-out and ≥450 pg/ml for HF rule-in in the ED setting). Results: The outpatient cohort comprised 3961 patients (age 45 ± 16 years), and NT-proBNP <125 pg/ml ruled-out HF with 86% sensitivity, while NT-proBNP level ≥250 pg/ml ruled-in with 68% specificity. The ED cohort comprised 687 patients (age 49 ± 16 years) and NT-proBNP level <300 pg/ml ruled-out HF with 82% sensitivity, and NT-proBNP level ≥450 pg/ml ruled-in HF with 75% specificity. Conclusions: These data support the use of these NT-proBNP levels for HF screening in the CHD population, which in turn would enable early detection and treatment of HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.