Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078652›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics2025

Enhancing Ultrasound Molecular Imaging: Toward Real-Time RPCA-Based Filtering to Differentiate Bound and Free Microbubbles.

Hoda S Hashemi, Dongwoon Hyun, Nathan Nguyen, Jihye Baek, Arutselvan Natarajan, Farbod Tabesh, Andrew Andrzejek, Ramasamy Paulmurugan, Jeremy J Dahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hoda S HashemiDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Dongwoon HyunSiemens Healthineers, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA.
Nathan NguyenDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Jihye BaekDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Arutselvan NatarajanDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Farbod TabeshDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Andrew AndrzejekDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Ramasamy PaulmuruganDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Jeremy J DahlDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.

Funding

STANFORD CANCER IMAGING TRAINING (SCIT) PROGRAMT32CA009695 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUCE L DANIEL, Jeremy Dahl · 1993 to 2026
$7.7M
B7-H3 Targeted Ultrasound Molecular Imaging System for Early Breast Cancer and Metastatic DetectionR01EB031799 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeremy Dahl, Ramasamy Paulmurugan · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Real-Time Freehand Ultrasound Molecular Imaging with Deep LearningK99EB032230 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HYUN, DONGWOON · 2021 to 2022
$183k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009695NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB032230NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound molecular imaging (UMI) is an advanced imaging modality that shows promise in detecting cancer at early stages. It uses microbubbles as contrast agents, which are functionalized to bind to cancer biomarkers overexpressed on endothelial cells. A major challenge in UMI is isolating bound microbubble signal, which represents the molecular imaging signal, from that of free-floating microbubbles, which is considered background noise. In this work, we propose a fast GPU-based method using robust principal component analysis (RPCA) to distinguish bound microbubbles from free-floating ones. We explore the method using simulations and measure the accuracy using the Dice coefficient and RMS error as functions of the number of frames used in RPCA reconstruction. Experiments using stationary and flowing microbubbles in tissue-mimicking phantoms were used to validate the method. Additionally, the method was applied to data from ten transgenic mouse models of breast cancer development, injected with B7-H3 targeted microbubbles, and two mice injected with non-targeted microbubbles. The results showed that RPCA using 20 frames achieved a Dice score of 0.95 and a computation time of 0.2 seconds, indicating that 20 frames is potentially suitable for real-time implementation. On in vivo data, RPCA using 20 frames achieved a Dice score of 0.82 with DTE, indicating good agreement between the two, given the limitations of each method.

Indexed as

Contrast agentsMicrobubblesRobust principle component analysisRPCAUltrasound molecular imagingUMI

Identifiers

PMID42078652
PMCPMC13132560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.