ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics2025
Enhancing Ultrasound Molecular Imaging: Toward Real-Time RPCA-Based Filtering to Differentiate Bound and Free Microbubbles.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improved Nondestructive Ultrasound Molecular Imaging With Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound molecular imaging (UMI) is an advanced imaging modality that shows promise in detecting cancer at early stages. It uses microbubbles as contrast agents, which are functionalized to bind to cancer biomarkers overexpressed on endothelial cells. A major challenge in UMI is isolating bound microbubble signal, which represents the molecular imaging signal, from that of free-floating microbubbles, which is considered background noise. In this work, we propose a fast GPU-based method using robust principal component analysis (RPCA) to distinguish bound microbubbles from free-floating ones. We explore the method using simulations and measure the accuracy using the Dice coefficient and RMS error as functions of the number of frames used in RPCA reconstruction. Experiments using stationary and flowing microbubbles in tissue-mimicking phantoms were used to validate the method. Additionally, the method was applied to data from ten transgenic mouse models of breast cancer development, injected with B7-H3 targeted microbubbles, and two mice injected with non-targeted microbubbles. The results showed that RPCA using 20 frames achieved a Dice score of 0.95 and a computation time of 0.2 seconds, indicating that 20 frames is potentially suitable for real-time implementation. On in vivo data, RPCA using 20 frames achieved a Dice score of 0.82 with DTE, indicating good agreement between the two, given the limitations of each method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.