Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078579›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Delineating Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Comorbid Risk With Clinical, Blood and Metabolomic Parameters-A UK Biobank Analysis.

Brian Ho, Yun Xu, Christopher E Goldring, Royston Goodacre, Munir Pirmohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian HoWolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Yun XuCentre for Metabolomics Research, Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Christopher E GoldringDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Royston GoodacreCentre for Metabolomics Research, Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Munir PirmohamedWolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/objectives: Ascertaining risk of and prognostication tools for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) remain suboptimal. Using the UK Biobank, we investigated the role of multivariate supervised learning in predicting MASLD risk and the presence of disease subgroups in stratifying the risk of comorbid outcomes. Methods: Two ground truth definitions for MASLD were derived using magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and electronic health records (EHRs). A training and validation set was created (60:40 split), using multiple imputation for missing data (mean missingness: 2.05%). Variable importance analyses of partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and random forest (RF) were used to select important clinical, genetic, haematological, biochemical, and metabolomic features of MASLD, which were subsequently used to train models to classify disease risk. The presence of MASLD subgroups were explored by K-means clustering and the relationship with comorbid disease outcomes were investigated. Results: Three thousand seven hundred ninety-nine and 2552 individuals were available for analysis for the two ground truth definitions. A total of 49 features were selected to train our final models. Model performance based on area under receiver operating characteristics for PLS-DA, RF, support vector machine linear kernel, and logistic regression were all above ≥0.80 (MRI-PDFF definition) and ≥0.85 (MRI-PDFF and EHR definition) at predicting MASLD. Unsupervised clustering of the features in MASLD identified two risk subgroups with a ∼3-fold difference in ischaemic stroke, hypertension, and extrahepatic malignancy, a ∼2-fold difference in hyperlipidaemia and T2DM, and a >1.5-fold difference in ischaemic heart disease and all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Using multivariate supervised learning models, we have identified features of MASLD in UK Biobank participants that can be used to predict the risk of comorbid diseases and outcomes. This provides insights into MASLD pathophysiology and highlights the potential of learning models for case identification and prognostication. Further external validation is required to assess applicability of the predictive features and for model optimisation.

Indexed as

comorbiditylearning modelsMASLDNAFLDrisk

Identifiers

PMID42078579
PMCPMC13129434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.