ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Efficacy of traditional Chinese massage therapy combined with Schroth therapy in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional structural deformity of the spine that arises due to genetic factors and unhealthy lifestyle habits during the adolescent growth period, prior to skeletal maturity. This condition significantly affects both the physical development and mental well-being of adolescents. Both traditional Chinese massage therapy and schroth therapy have been clinically validated as effective interventions for scoliosis. However, whether the combination of these two approaches yields superior therapeutic outcomes remains controversial. Therefore, this study employed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of traditional Chinese massage therapy combined with Schroth therapy in the treatment of AIS. Methods: We systematically searched multiple databases, including the Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang database, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of traditional Chinese massage therapy combined with Schroth therapy on AIS, with the search period extending up to January 2025. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted relevant data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14.0 to conduct the meta-analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was utilized to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome. Results: A total of eight studies involving 549 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the combination of traditional Chinese massage and schroth therapy significantly improved overall treatment outcomes for AIS [RR = 1.16, 95%CI(1.01, 1.32), Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that traditional Chinese massage therapy combined with Schroth therapy may offer greater clinical benefits than Schroth therapy alone for patients with AIS. However, owing to the limited number and methodological quality of the included studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution and further validated in high-quality research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.