Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078450›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Multidimensional assessment of acne vulgaris: links between psychiatric symptoms, disordered eating, and dermatologic severity.

Aydan Yazıcı, Ayşe Döndü

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aydan YazıcıDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkiye.
Ayşe DöndüDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease that extends beyond dermatologic symptoms to include psychosocial and behavioral consequences. Although the psychological impact of acne has been acknowledged, the interplay between psychiatric symptoms, eating behaviors, and quality of life remains underexplored. Objectives: To evaluate the associations between psychiatric symptoms, eating behavior patterns, and quality of life among patients with acne vulgaris compared to healthy controls. Methods: This case-control study included 120 patients with acne vulgaris and 100 sex-matched controls, age-adjusted in the analyses. Dermatologic assessment included the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS), acne scar characteristics, and the Turkish Acne Quality of Life (TAQoL) questionnaire. Psychiatric and behavioral evaluations included the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT), the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories, Night Eating Syndrome parameters, and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Turkish Short Form-13 item (EDE-Q-13). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0, applying Mann-Whitney U, Pearson chi-square, logistic regression, and partial correlation tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Significance was set at Results: Patients with acne were predominantly female (80.0%) and significantly younger than controls (median age, 20 vs. 24 years, Conclusion: Acne vulgaris was associated with psychiatric distress, disordered eating, and impaired quality of life in this case-control sample. These findings support a broader psychosocial perspective, but causal inferences cannot be drawn from this cross-sectional design.

Indexed as

acne vulgarisdermatologic severitydisordered eatingpsychiatric symptomsquality of life

Identifiers

PMID42078450
PMCPMC13132772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.