ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Predicting sepsis prognosis using deep learning with routine biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Sepsis, a critical illness with extremely high mortality, has its patient prognosis early predicted as crucial to improving therapeutic outcomes. Early and accurate risk stratification is particularly vital for emergency sepsis patients, who often present with rapid disease progression and complex pathophysiological changes. This study aimed to construct an artificial intelligence (AI) model integrating red cell distribution width (RDW) and estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) to predict the 28-day mortality of patients with emergency sepsis. Methods: Based on the data of 73 sepsis patients in the emergency department (42 in the survival group and 31 in the death group), a multilayer perceptron (MLP) deep learning neural network model was constructed. Internal and external validations were conducted using independent MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV datasets, and the model performance was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: In internal validation, the deep learning model achieved an accuracy of 87.0%; during external validation, its accuracy improved to 92.0%, with a sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 83.0%. Patients in the deceased group exhibited significantly elevated RDW and ePVS ( Conclusion: This study successfully developed a deep learning-based prognostic prediction model, confirming that a deep learning framework integrating RDW and ePVS can significantly enhance the predictive accuracy for the prognosis of emergency department sepsis patients. This novel predictive strategy compensates for the limitations of traditional single biomarkers and clinical scoring systems. This approach aids in the early identification of high-risk patients and provides an intelligent support tool for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.