Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078381›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Modeling the impact of adherence to U.S. isolation and masking guidance on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in office workplaces in 2021-2022.

Maria Garcia Quesada, Karina Wallrafen-Sam, Moses Chapa, Faruque Ahmed, Obianuju Genevieve Aguolu, Noureen Ahmed, Saad B Omer, Benjamin A Lopman, Samuel M Jenness

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Garcia QuesadaRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-0206-7597
Karina Wallrafen-SamRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Moses ChapaRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Faruque AhmedCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Obianuju Genevieve AguoluCollege of Public Heath, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-3024
Noureen AhmedPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Saad B OmerPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Benjamin A LopmanRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Samuel M JennessRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

Training a New Generation of VaccinologistsT32AI074492 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Rama Rao Amara, Benjamin A Lopman · 2009 to 2026
$6.4M
Comprehensive Profiling of Social Mixing Patterns in Resource Poor CountriesR01HD097175 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LOPMAN, BENJAMIN A, OMER, SAAD B. · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Infectious Diseases Across Scales Training ProgramT32AI138952 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Jacobus de Roode · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074492NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI138952NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD097175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been important for controlling SARS-CoV-2 transmission, particularly before and during initial vaccine rollout. During the pandemic, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued isolation and masking guidance in case of COVID-19-like illness, a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, or known exposure to SARS-CoV-2. However, the impact of this guidance on mitigating transmission in office workplaces is unclear. We used a network-based mathematical model to estimate the impact of this guidance on SARS-CoV-2 transmission among office workers and their communities. The model represented social contacts in the home, office, and community. We used data from the CorporateMix study to parametrize social contacts among office workers and calibrated the model to represent the COVID-19 epidemic in Georgia, USA from January 2021 through August 2022. In the reference scenario (58% adherence to guidance among office workers and the broader population), workplace transmission accounted for a small fraction of total infections. Reducing adherence among office workers to 0% increased workplace transmissions by 27.1% and increasing adherence to 75% reduced workplace transmission by 7.0%. Increasing adherence to 75% among office workers had minimal impact on symptomatic cases and deaths; increasing it among the broader population was more effective in reducing office worker cases and deaths. In our model, moderate adherence to recommended NPIs in workplaces was effective in reducing transmission, but increasing adherence had limited benefit given workplaces that have low contact intensity and hybrid work arrangements. These results underscore the public health benefits of community-wide adoption of recommended NPIs.

Identifiers

PMID42078381
PMCPMC13131717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.