Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078364›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Preconception metabolic-bariatric surgery and child health outcomes: Identification and cohort profile of the POSIT study protocol.

Jonathan Q Purnell, Darios Getahun, Kimberly K Vesco, Sijia Qiu, Jiaxiao M Shi, Carmen P Wong, Padma Koppolu, Theresa M Im, Caryn E Oshiro, Janne Boone-Heinonen

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jonathan Q PurnellOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5505-6333
Darios GetahunDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Kimberly K VescoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Sijia QiuDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4828-3180
Jiaxiao M ShiDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8397-3729
Carmen P WongKaiser Permanente Center for Integrated Health Care Research, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Padma KoppoluKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Theresa M ImDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Caryn E OshiroKaiser Permanente Center for Integrated Health Care Research, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Janne Boone-HeinonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preconception weight loss by metabolic-bariatric surgery (MBS) improves maternal-fetal outcomes, but little is known about its impact on offspring growth and health. The preconception bariatric surgery and child health outcomes (POSIT) study aims to estimate the effects of maternal MBS-induced preconception weight loss on infant and childhood body size, growth, and related outcomes. This report presents the methods used to construct the POSIT cohort and its baseline characteristics. This retrospective cohort study sampled members from a United States healthcare system aged 18 and older with a singleton, live birth to create three study groups: 1) a treatment group including women who underwent preconception MBS and subsequently became pregnant (n=1,374); 2) a control group matched to the MBS pre-surgery body mass index (BMI) (pre-surgery controls, n=13,740); and 3) a second control group matched to the MBS post-surgical, pre-pregnancy BMI (pre-pregnancy controls, n=13,740). MBS and pre-surgery BMI controls showed slight imbalances in that pre-surgery BMI controls were on average ~6 months younger, had 0.6 lower BMI (44.5 kg/m

Identifiers

PMID42078364
PMCPMC13131957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.